|
Leading conservation scientists from around the world have called for a substantial role for nuclear power in future energy-generating scenarios2 in order to mitigate3 climate change and protect biodiversity. In an open letter to environmentalists with more than 60 signatories, the scientists ask the environmental community to "weigh up the pros4 and cons1 of different energy sources using objective evidence and pragmatic trade-offs, rather than simply relying on idealistic perceptions of what is 'green' ."
Organized by ecologists Professor Barry Brook5 and Professor Corey Bradshaw from the University of Adelaide's Environment Institute, the letter supports their recent article 'Key role for nuclear energy in global biodiversity conservation', published in the journal Conservation Biology.
"Full decarbonization of the global electricity-generation sector6 is required soon to avoid the worst ravages7 of climate change," says Professor Bradshaw, Director, Ecological8 Modelling at the Environment Institute and recently appointed Sir Hubert Wilkins Chair of Climate Change.
"Biodiversity is not only threatened by climate disruption arising largely from fossil-fuel derived9 emissions10, it is also threatened by land transformation11 resulting from renewable energy sources, such as flooded areas for hydro-electricity, agricultural areas needed for biofuels and large spaces needed for wind and solar farms."
In the article, the researchers evaluated land use, emissions, climate and cost implications of three different energy scenarios: 'business as usual' fossil-fuel dominated; a high renewable-energy mix excluding nuclear; and an energy mix with a large nuclear contribution plus some renewable and fossil-fuel sources.
责编:admin
返回顶部 打印
|