人类技术创新在东半球间歇出现

The analysis of artifacts from a 325,000-year-old site in Armenia shows that human technological¹ innovation occurred intermittently² throughout the Old World, rather than spreading from a single point of origin, as previously³ thought. The study, published today in the journal Science, examines thousands of stone artifacts retrieved⁴ from Nor Geghi 1, a unique site preserved between two lava⁵ flows dated to 200,000-400,000 years ago. Layers of floodplain sediments⁶ and an ancient soil found between these lava flows contain the archaeological material. The dating of volcanic⁷ ash found within the sediments and detailed⁸ study of the sediments themselves allowed researchers to correlate the stone tools with a period between 325,000 and 335,000 years ago when Earth's climate was similar to today's.   The stone tools provide early evidence for the simultaneous use of two distinct technologies: biface technology, commonly associated with hand axe⁹ production during the Lower Paleolithic, and Levallois technology, a stone tool production method typically attributed to the Middle Stone Age in Africa and the Middle Paleolithic in Eurasia. Traditionally, Archaeologists use the development of Levallois technology and the disappearance¹⁰ of biface technology to mark the transition from the Lower to the Middle Paleolithic roughly 300,000 years ago.   Archaeologists have argued that Levallois technology was invented in Africa and spread to Eurasia with expanding human populations, replacing local biface technologies in the process. This theory draws a link between populations and technologies and thus equates¹¹ technological change with demographic change. The co-existence of the two technologies at Nor Geghi 1 provides the first clear evidence that local populations developed Levallois technology out of existing biface technology.   "The combination of these different technologies in one place suggests to us that, about 325,000 years ago, people at the site were innovative," says Daniel Adler, associate professor of Anthropology¹² at the University of Connecticut, and the study's lead author. Moreover, the chemical analysis of several hundred obsidian¹³ artifacts shows that humans at the site utilized¹⁴ obsidian outcrops from as far away as 120 kilometers (approximately 75 miles), suggesting they must also have been capable of exploiting large, environmentally diverse territories.   The paper argues that biface and Levallois technology, while distinct in many regards, share a common pedigree. In biface technology, a mass of stone is shaped through the removal of flakes#p#分页标题#e#¹⁵ from two surfaces in order to produce a tool such as a hand axe. The flakes detached during the manufacture of a biface are treated as waste. In Levallois technology, a mass of stone is shaped through the removal of flakes in order to produce a convex surface from which flakes of predetermined size and shape are detached. The predetermined flakes produced through Levallois technology are the desired products. Archaeologists suggest that Levallois t echnology is optimal¹⁶ in terms of raw material use and that the predetermined flakes are relatively¹⁷ small and easy to carry. These were important issues for the highly mobile hunter-gatherers of the time.