胚胎干细胞的基因表达推论遭质疑

Whitehead Institute researchers have determined¹ that the transcription factor（转录因子） Nanog, which plays a critical role in the self-renewal of embryonic² stem cells, is expressed in a manner similar to other pluripotency（多能性） markers. This finding contradicts the field's presumptions³ about this important gene⁴ and its role in the differentiation⁵ of embryonic stem cells. A large body of research has reported that Nanog is allelically regulated -- that is, only one copy of the gene is expressed at any given time -- and fluctuations⁶ in its expression are responsible for the differences seen in individual embryonic stem (ES) cells' predilection⁷（偏爱，嗜好） to differentiate⁸ into more specialized⁹ cells. These studies relied on cells that had a genetic¹⁰ marker or reporter inserted in the DNA¹¹ upstream of the Nanog gene. This latest research, published in this week's edition of the journal Cell Stem Cell, suggests that results from studies based on this approach could be called into question.   To quantify the variations in Nanog expression, Dina Faddah, a graduate student in the lab of Whitehead Institute Founding Member Rudolf Jaenisch, looked at hundreds of individual mouse ES cells with reporters inserted immediately downstream of the Nanog gene. One Nanog allele had a green reporter, while the other had a red reporter, allowing Faddah to determine which of the two alleles was being expressed.   After analyzing¹² the results and comparing them to the expression of a "housekeeping" gene and other pluripotency factors, Faddah concluded that, regardless of the cells' growing environment, most ES cells express both Nanog alleles and the variability of this expression corresponds to that of the other genes¹³.   When Faddah tested the established method of inserting a reporter upstream of Nanog, her results reflected the earlier studies' conclusions. However, when she checked the results with other forms of gene expression analysis, she found that the method was not a faithful indicator¹⁴ of Nanog's expression.   "The way the reporter was inserted into the DNA seems to disrupt the regulation of the alleles（等位基因）, so that when the reporter says Nanog isn't being expressed, it actually is," says Faddah.   For Jaenisch, this is an instructional tale that should be heeded¹⁵ by all geneticists.   "Clearly, the conclusions for this particular gene need to be reconsidered," says Jaenisch, who is also a professor of biology at MIT. "And it raises the question for other genes. For some genes, there might be similar issues. For other genes, they might be more resistant#p#分页标题#e#¹⁶ to this type of disturbances¹⁷ caused by a reporter."   This work is supported Vertex Scholars Program, the National Science Foundation (NSF), Jerome and Florence Brill Fellowship, Croucher and Ludwig Research Fellowship, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (1 F32 GM099153-01A1, HD 045022 and R37CA084198).